Who are these guys?

John Beck ... getting hurt.

So how good are the Redskins?

The Bills didn't seem to provide much of a challenge last week, and the Skins' starting offense played very little. One thing is for sure, the Ravens will provide a bigger challenge, especially for the Redskins' offense.

A few things I'll be watching closely:


How the Redskins' starting offensive line performs against Baltimore's strong defensive front seven. Larry Johnson is expected to start for the Skins, and it'll be a good chance to see how he can perform against a top defense. Rookie lineman Trent Williams especially will bear watching.

How outside linebackers Brian Orakpo and Andre Carter perform. Against the Bills, Carter in particular seemed to struggle with the move to OLB in the 3-4. Both he and Orakpo will be responsible for a lot of the coverage on running backs. And at this point, that's a very scary sentence.

Speaking of defense, can the Redskins stop the run? As I pointed out after the Bills game, the Skins' defense gave up an average of 8.1 yards a carry last week against the Bills. That's unacceptable. The defenses' run-stopping ability must improve, or it could be a very long season.

Who is the third QB? Is there one? John Beck looked shaky at best against the Bills (The Skins' third-team offensive line didn't help), and Richard Bartel sat out last week with a hamstring injury. Coach Mike Shanahan has intimated that neither is a lock to make the team. Neither figures to get much time (a half at most), so every snap is important.

As always, hope for no significant injuries Saturday night. Oh, and don't forget to make fun of Jim Zorn. (I know, too easy).

So far, so good

McNabb, Redskins all smiles after blowout

First of all, apologies that I haven't updated this space as much as I should have. Busy times. And I promise to try and keep this as updated as needed. But if you want even more of my Redskins comments, I highly recommend you find me on Twitter: @EatSleepRedskin.

Anyway, let's talk football.

The Redskins opened up their 2010 (pre)season with a 42-17 crushing of the Buffalo Bills, who, like the Redskins, have a brand new head coach with a brand new offense and defense. I know Redskins fans will get very excited about the win, but one thing is clear after watching the game: The Skins, under Mike Shanahan, are light years ahead of the Bills under Chan Gailey. This is not to say that the win wasn't impressive, but keep in mind the starters only played about one quarter. New Redskin Donovan McNabb and the offense were merely average at that point.

General comments about the offense:
One thing that was clear to me Friday night was the team's crispness. By that I mean how the offense got in and out of the huddle. There wasn't any hurrying or moments where the team seemed confused. McNabb (and backup Rex Grossman) seemed to know where everyone was and what they were doing. That's a big step up from previous seasons under the constantly confused Jim Zorn.

General comments about the defense:
Alright I'll say it: The run defense worries me. The Bills averaged 8.1 yards a carry as a team, and that's a scary number. Andre Carter particularly looked out of place at times, coming too wide and allowing RBs to scoot inside for big gains. Perhaps this isn't a trend that will continue. Perhaps as Albert Haynesworth gains back his starting duties, the defense will be able to stop the run. When I first heard that the Skins were going to a 3-4 base for the first time in team history, it was welcome news. I, like most Redskins fans, had grown tired of Greg Blache's "bend but don't break" defense, which was about as boring as watching paint dry. The 3-4 we saw Friday night showed pass-rushing promise, but the Bills runners were able to run wild.

Individual honors
Those that I thought improved their stock immensely against the Bills:

Brandon Banks. Banks is tiny. 5-7ish. 150ish. Tiny. The only way this guy is making the team is with standout play on returns and maybe some good plays on offense. His return ability is obviously tremendous. (Does he return kicks, too? No. Seriously.) He'll eventually have to show he has some usefulness on offense too. But there are three more games to play.

Trent Williams. The rookie showed he can play. Didn't allow any of the Bills rushers to get near McNabb or Grossman. The offensive line, as a whole, stood out to me. They didn't allow a sack until the fourth quarter. Poor John Beck. If Williams continues to show what he did on Friday night, the Redskins should be set at LT for the next decade or more.

Ryan Torain and Keiland Williams. With Larry Johnson and Willie Parker both intentionally held out of the game, Torain and Williams got most of the work Friday night, and while neither stood out, both showed flash enough to play in the NFL. The battle to back up Clinton Portis and Johnson (who has shined in camp) will get very interesting as the preseason goes on.

Biggest question mark
Well, maybe not the biggest, but who the heck will be returning kicks this season for the Redskins? Certainly, it won't be Devin Thomas, who muffed one kickoff and looked shaky on another. I'd like to see Banks get a look there.

That's all for now. Hit me with some feedback.

In LaVar vs. Portis, "Wolverine" wins

When LaVar Arrington first entered the league, I quickly nicknamed him "Wolverine," after the comic book hero who was violent, very aggressive, and who had the ability to heal very quickly.

In his early years with the Redskins, Arrington displayed an unmatched tenacity on the field. He was like a rocket, hurtling towards running backs and quarterbacks alike. His most famous hit, of course, is the one that ended Troy Aikman's career.

Arrington's "healing factor," so to speak, was on display throughout his early career. I remember one instance in particular when Arrington was literally knocked out in the first half, but returned to play later in the game.

His healing ability ran out, though, and Arrington retired from the NFL and became a sports radio personality in the D.C. area.

And, apparently, Clinton Portis doesn't like him very much, but we'll get to that later.

Arrington had a falling out with the Redskins, and eventually left for the rival New York Giants before the 2006 season. He lasted just one injury filled season before he was forced to retire.


So it was with a bit of surprise when Arrington returned to the world of the Redskins at Sean Taylor's funeral in 2007. Arrington and Taylor were only teammates for two seasons -- most of which Arrington spent injured. But LaVar's words touched me more than any other that day:



LaVar's comments start at 2:52.

Enter Portis.

Portis first criticized Arrington back in February. Arrington then responded on his radio show, and if you haven't heard the audio from that response, I recommend that you do.  

All was quiet until yesterday, when a radio interview of Portis criticizing Arrington was released. Portis criticized Arrington for what he said at Taylor's funeral.

Courtesy of the Bog, here's what Portis said:

"I lost a lot of respect for LaVar at that moment, speaking at Sean's funeral. To get up, I really thought that was, um, I don't know what you call that. LaVar ain't know Sean like that....
"I remember me and Sean was going to jump LaVar, you know, for throwing pie at Sean's face his rookie year, and trying to haze Sean, and be the tough guy. He felt like it was a joke. We didn't like that [stuff]. For all the attention LaVar claim, and that him and Sean was cool -- they wasn't cool. Sean ain't [mess around] with LaVar....I don't think you should do that. If you cool with somebody, or you know somebody, you knew 'em. Don't go and portray, set out an image like 'this is your buddy, this is your pal,' like you all hung, when y'all really didn't. I don't think that's fair, man."

Wow.

Well, Arrington responded today on the radio, but not in the way expected: he took the high road.

Among his comments:

"When you go into personal things like that I can only hope and wish and pray he finds peace and clarity in his own life."

In this battle, Arrington did more by doing nothing. Portis continues to embarrass himself by spreading hate. If I didn't know any better, I'd think he was trying to get himself fired.

Way to go, LaVar, by turning the other cheek.

Why Galloway and Wade make sense

The Redskins recently signed two veteran wide receivers -- Joey Galloway and Bobby Wade.

Galloway, who literally is a graybeard, has played 15 years in the NFL for five different teams and has caught 689 passes for 10,777 yards.

Wade, while not quite as aged as Galloway, will be going into his ninth year in the league and has already played for four different teams.

Neither of these signings figures to loom large this season. Galloway is just two years younger than his new receivers coach, Kennan McCardell and Wade has been nothing if not a journeyman.

But here's something to keep in mind: Some Redskins fans have been clammoring for D.C. to sign Terrell Owens, the big-play, once-hated rival. Owens is 36 and will turn 37 before this season is over. If Owens is still a stud receiver, it's possible that Galloway can still display the speed that made him an NFL star. And Wade has started 50 games in his eight-year career.

The Redskins have 11 receivers listed on their roster. Before Galloway and Wade were signed, they had just two receivers with more than three years of NFL experience: Roydell Williams and Santana Moss. Galloway and Wade will bring some much-needed veteran savvy, at least as long as they're with the team.

For Redskins, no draft surprises -- so far

Despite a late smoke screen with rumors that they might select Tennessee safety Eric Berry, Mike Shanahan and the Redskins did the wise thing and picked Oklahoma tackle Trent Williams with the No. 4 pick in the NFL draft.

The Skins were in dire need of an offensive line upgrade after last season, and with the free-agent moves they've made so far this offseason, combined with the selection of Williams, the line is definitely improved.

Williams played right tackle for the Sooners until his senior year, when he switched to left tackle. And while Oklahoma State's Russell Okung was listed above Williams on most draft boards, Williams is considered to have higher pro potential than the solid-if-not-spectacular Okung. So the Redskins are banking on Williams playing up to his potential.

As for the rest of the draft, unless the team can find buyers for Jason Campbell or Albert Haynesworth, the Skins won't have too many more selections in this draft, so it'll have to come down to quality over quantity.

It's draft time! 2010 version

Amongst all of this schedule hoopla, I almost forgot that the NFL draft starts Thursday night!

I still have to believe that the Redskins will be picking an offensive tackle. Despite all of the talk and speculation, clearly the Redskins' biggest need is still a left tackle.

Now, whether it'll be Oklahoma State's Russell Okung or Oklahoma's Trent Williams, I don't know.

New coach Mike Shanahan has been playing coy with media, and his son has been suggesting that the Skins' offensive line is just fine the way it is. But if Washington selects anyone other than one of those above, it'll be a surprise to me.

So who do you have tonight?

Schedule, 2010

The NFL released its 2010 schedule Tuesday, and so I now get to tell you all how I think the Redskins will do this season.

First off, the actual schedule, courtesy of the Redskins:

What we have here is a fairly balanced schedule. When the opponents were initially released, I thought that it was an overpoweringly difficult schedule, but the "difficult" opponents are spread out over the season, so the first half of the schedule is similar to the second half. (Also, note that the Bye week comes in the exact middle of the season).

But there aren't too many "gimmie" games for the Skins. The closest they come are at the Lions, against Houston, at the Rams and at Jacksonville, and those aren't too easy. Consider: The Lions -- THE LIONS! -- edged the Skins last season.

Prime time = ouch
There are three national TV games on the docket, which hasn't been good for the Redskins recently. The Redskins played three prime time games in 2009 and lost all three. Not only that, but they scored just 29 points in those three games COMBINED. They were shut out by the Cowboys, 17-0.

The Redskins are winless in their last two seasons in prime-time games. They're 1-5 for the last three years, and 1-7 in the last four years. Since 2004, the Redskins have won just 3 prime-time games. 3 out of 14 games. Ouch.

Divisional games ...
I really would like to say that I think the Skins will go far this coming season. But, going game-by-game, I just have trouble seeing anything over a .500 season. Of course, that may be because I'm marking off all divisional games as a loss.

Yes, I'm giving the Redskins an "L" for every divisional game, even against the McNabb-less Eagles. Why? Because the Skins have had trouble with divisional victories for several years now. Color me skeptical, but I'll wait until Shanahan and Co. start beating the pants off the Giants, Eagles and Cowboys until I start to be a believer.

Might the Redskins be better off without Okung?

The general consensus among NFL scout-types and Redskins fans alike is that the team from Washington will draft Oklahoma State tackle Russell Okung with the fourth overall pick in the 2010 NFL Draft.

But I'm here to ask a question:

Might the Redskins, who lack draft picks, be better off trading down, thereby picking more draft picks, and selecting either Oklahoma tackle Trent Williams or Iowa's Bryan Bulaga?

There's a growing thought that Williams and/or Bulaga might actually be better than Okung for various reasons -- athletic ability, NFL potential, etc. But there's also the question of whether Williams especially, but also Bulaga, might fit the Redskins' new blocking schemes better than Okung, who has struggled against speed rushers.

It's something to think about at the very least. The team could obviously use more draft picks, but the likely trades of Jason Campbell and/or a running back might solve that issue. Don't be surprised if the Redskins bypass Okung.

Of course, the Lions might make the decision much easier if they select a left tackle with the No 2 overall draft pick.

CSN's Rich Tandler had a far more detailed write-up, and you should all go read it. 

Okung highlights/lowlights



Williams highlights/lowlights



Bulaga highlights/lowlights

Failed Redskins QBs

So the Washington Post posted a photo gallery of every starting quarterback for the Redskins since 1992.

They titled this gallery "Redskins quarterbacks: A revolving door." 

Sadly, they are not wrong.

But as I went through all of the names and faces, I realized that I had forgotten some of these guys ever started for the Redskins.

Which names surprised you? Or which jumped out? I totally forgot about Tim Hasselbeck.

Another guy who stood out to me was Brad Johnson. Boy, the team really misused him. Didn't play that badly, had a winning record, but then was dumped and went on to win a Super Bowl.

Actually, that's kind of fitting.

McNabb to the Redskins

Offseason champs, baby!

For those fans who thought that the Redskins were being too quiet under Bruce Allen and Mike Shanahan this offseason, the team had a big answer Sunday.

The Redskins and the Philadelphia Eagles agreed to a deal to send veteran star quarterback Donovan McNabb to Washington in exchange for a second-round pick in this year's draft and a fourth-round pick in next year's. Considering the relatively low cost, getting a guy like McNabb -- who has started 142 games in his NFL career -- was a good deal.

But what does this deal really mean? Well, for starters ...

• The Redskins found their starting QB for the 2010 season. Say goodbye to Jason Campbell. It doesn't make much sense to keep a guy like Jason, who has sizable trade value, when it's obvious that Campbell won't be starting unless McNabb gets injured. Rex Grossman was brought in to be the system guy.

• The Redskins' first-round pick is probably settled. Now that the Redskins have a suitable starter at QB for this season, it seems likely the team will select an offensive tackle (like Oklahoma State's Russell Okung) later this month. 

• The Eagles have been weakened. If McNabb knows anything, it's how Philly's offense works. He's been starting for the Eagles since 1999. The Eagles now figure to start either Kevin Kolb or Michael Vick, but McNabb being with the Redskins should cause the Eagles some headaches. 

Still far more to come about this.

Buchanon strong option to start

The Redskins signed free-agent cornerback Phillip Buchanon Monday, nabbing yet another former star from Miami.

If you're keeping track, that's now four former Hurricanes on the team: Clinton Portis, Santana Moss, Rocky McIntosh and Buchanon.

Taking a quick look at the Redskins' roster, you can probably pencil Buchanon in as a nickel back right now, but he has the potential to start opposite DeAngelo Hall. Carlos Rodgers has started many games for the Redskins, but he was benched multiple times last season and hasn't exactly stood out. Last year's third-round draft pick, Kevin Barnes, was a non-factor his rookie year.

Would not be surprised if Buchanon was starting by mid-season, if not sooner.

A new (hope?) thought: Tim Tebow

While Albert Haynesworth talked about switching to the 3-4 and Devin Thomas dismantled former coach Jim Zorn, a topic recently popped up on news sites, fan sites and message boards: Could the Redskins be thinking about drafting former Florida quarterback Tim Tebow?

Yeah, yeah. I know. Can't throw. Can't read defenses. Gator QB (EW!). But the guy is a college football living legend for a reason.

Let's say that offensive tackle Russell Okung falls to the Redskins in the first round. What's the Redskins' second biggest need? Another OL? Okay maybe. Also, the team might use another young running back. Maybe another linebacker or safety. But a young QB not named Colt Brennan (who, the way things are looking, won't survive training camp) would be a good idea, too.

Tebow has his problems, sure. But if there was one player in this draft I would want to take a gamble on, it's Tebow.

Here's a video, with some of his highlights.



One wild thought: If the Skins draft Tebow, get him used to the system slowly. Use him at fullback on some runs. Give him the ball on some running plays. Then have him throw from the FB position. He could have a dangerous weapon if used well. Just a thought.

Also, take a look at the stats of six college quarterbacks, and guess which is Tebow. You may be surprised.

Final note
If the Redskins draft Tebow, that will be the latest in a long line of GatorSkin QBs. Remember Danny Wuerffel? Shane Matthews? Rex Grossman was recently signed to be a system mentor/backup. All the Redskins are missing is Chris Leak, who is apparently playing in Canada for Montreal of the CFL. Go get em, Danny.

And your next Washington Redskins draftee will be ...

(March 18 edition)

All signs point to the Redskins either selecting a quarterback or a left tackle in the first round of this year's draft.

But which one will it be? Do the Redskins trust quarterback Jason Campbell? Can they protect him with their current offensive line?

The team has signed several offensive linemen this offseason, but none appear to be the standout left tackle. Wednesday, the team also signed quarterback Rex Grossman, who worked with new offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan and QB coach Matt LaFleur in Houston. Grossman doesn't figure to start ahead of Campbell.

That leaves us with little to go on for whom the Redskins may be targeting.

A lot will depend on what the teams ahead of Washington do in the draft. Up first are the Rams, who could use either a stud defensive lineman or a big-time QB. The general feeling right now is that St. Louis will pick Sam Bradford, a quarterback from Oklahoma.

The Lions are next, and they have a solid QB in Matthew Stafford. Look for the Lions to either go with Oklahoma State OT Russell Okung or defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh.

If the Lions take Suh, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers will likely take Oklahoma defensive tackle Gerald McCoy. If the Lions take Okung, look for Tampa to pick Suh.

Now come the Redskins, who seem to like Bradford, Okung and Notre Dame quarterback Jimmy Clausen.

Here's how I see it: If Bradford is there, they'll pick him. If he's gone, they'll go after Okung. If both are off the board, they'll pick Clausen. The Redskins can't trade down too much or risk losing Clausen to a team like Seattle, which also needs a QB.

The third option is to stick with Campbell and trade down for more draft picks and a shot at lower tier offensive line talent like Rutgers' Anthony Davis.

Best bet for your newest Washington Redskin:
Jimmy Clausen.

Change has come, and that name is Shanahan

It's been a few months, but the Redskins -- and I along with them -- are getting back into action.

The team opened spring workouts on Monday, learning new offensive and defensive schemes, and meeting new coaches.

But before we go there, though, let's take a look back at this offseason so far.

If you'll kindly remember the last time we saw the 'Skins, they were finishing up yet another disappointing season, led by first-year coach Jim Zorn.

Well, Zorn was ousted. Another NFL legend took charge of the Redskins, this one named Mike Shanahan.

And Shanahan wanted change. Boy, did he bring it.

Goodbye to old favorites like Fred Smoot and Cornelius Griffin. Goodbye to running backs Ladell Betts and Rock Cartwright, as well as receiver Antwaan Randle El. Goodbye to many other old friends.

"A day of change," new Redskins personnel guru Bruce Allen called it. I'd call it as a house cleaning. And by God, it was sorely needed -- out with old, past-their-prime talent.

And free agency brought its usual excitement for Redskins fans. Except this March was not like the recent others. There was no big Albert Haynesworth-like signing. No Julius Peppers. No LaDainian Tomlinson.

The Redskins wanted to focus on their offensive line. They took a look at Packers OT Chad Clifton, but he re-signed with Green Bay. They took a look at OT Tony Pashos, but he signed with Cleveland. They re-signed Mike Williams, the mammoth tackle-turned-guard.

Yet no free agent signings. No Willie Parker, who visited. No Larry Foote, who visited. No Casey Wiegmann, who visited.

What in the name of Dan Snyder is going on here? Usually, when Washington wants someone, they get him. And guys going in and out of Redskins Park without a deal is not the norm.

But the Redskins eventually signed Artis Hicks, the former Minnesota guard/tackle who cleared holes for Adrian Peterson. The team also signed Larry Johnson, a 30-year-old past-his-prime running back.

Personnel changes aren't the only changes in Ashburn. The team will be switching from a 4-3 defensive scheme to a 3-4 scheme, meaning instead of four defensive linemen and three linebackers, there will be three defensive linemen and four linebackers.

Offensively, the addition of Johnson creates questions at running back. Mainly, how are Clinton Portis and Johnson going to interact? Both have been known to have explosive personalities. Can they make it through an entire season together, sharing carries?

Despite heavy criticism, Jason Campbell continues to look like the starting quarterback of next year's team. Shanahan's system is usually very QB-friendly. If Campbell is going to have success, he'll have it under Shanahan. And the team seems committed to rebuilding an offensive line that was dreadful last season.

Up next for the Redskins is the draft. Something I'll write about later this week.

End of an error

Well, the Jim Zorn Error -- I mean Era -- is officially over.

And the least-guarded secret in Washington is that former Denver coach Mike Shanahan will be the next head coach of the Redskins.

The only thing I can say right here is that Shanahan's tenure in D.C. will undoubtedly be more effective than Zorn's.

Zorn's 6-2 start was a blatent mirage. He had six wins in his first eight games and then six wins over his last 24 games.

Above all, though, the Zorn era will be remembered, I think, a lot like the Spurrier era was in D.C. A supposedly offensive coach comes to D.C. and the Redskins start well -- remember Osaka? -- but ultimately, there was fighting in the locker room and there systemic lack of discipline.

I admit I didn't pay a lot of attention to Shanahan's Denver teams, but the guy has won a Super Bowl before, and his teams were almost always competitive. Both of Zorn's teams ...well, weren't.

Truthfully, I am fairly sure that Shanahan's time in D.C. could not possibly be any worse than Zorn's.